1. Many men have trouble finding physical and emotional intimacy
2. Men are given terrible advice to fix this

Or, more generally, our society’s plan for men isn’t good for them, personally.

Now, men have never had an easy ride unless they were one of the aristocracy. We’ve always been the labouring sex, the risk-taking sex, the disposable sex. In the world of the past, those burdens came with rewards for the those of us who survived our disposability.

Now those rewards have been called “privileges”, and taken away. (And the burdens have been called “privileges”, too, but have not been taken away.)

Now, when something unfair happens to a woman, her usual response to point this unfairness out to whoever appears to have power. But men, being less submissive, tend to blame ourselves, ask “What am I doing wrong?”, and try to change either our behaviour or our environment (by going elsewhere).

So the first thing we got was a generation or two of men thinking that we, personally, were no good, and was why we couldn’t get laid, or why we couldn’t get jobs, or why we couldn’t pay off our student loans, or why we came home from the war broken and unable to fit back in, or why our marriages exploded and we lost our children, our homes, and our livelihoods.

So we looked to women to tell us what it was we were doing wrong. After all, many of our problems were with them, and even if they weren’t, women seemed to be prospering. On top of that, they seemed to have this mysterious power to love themselves unconditionally. And everyone, everywhere, kept telling us to treat them with kindness and respect, and even reverence, because they could do anything we could do, anything at all, even backwards and in heels.

And when a man sees someone doing better than him, his first impulse is not to stab, but to try to learn.

And women were certainly willing to give us advice. Oh, boy, were they ever willing to give us advice. Page after page, speech after speech, of what we should and shouldn’t do, who we should and shouldn’t be, what they wanted, what they didn’t, exactly what a man’s role was and wasn’t. Women were all too willing to define masculinity for us, if asked. Or even if not asked.

And, of course, when we followed this advice, things got worse.

And gradually we came to realize that when we asked these “new women”, empowered by feminism, what a man should do, they didn’t hear “What should a man’s life be like?”, they heard “What do you want for christmas?”.

No one answering was giving any thought at all to what might happen to us in the process of fulfilling women’s ambitions and fantasies.

We woke up to the fact that women’s lists of what a man should do were the equivalent of a 12 year old girl asking daddy for a pony. She doesn’t worry about whether daddy can actually afford to buy her one, because she’s aware that daddy is older and wiser and more worldly than her, and will figure out for himself if he can do that, and is willing to. She knows he will probably tell her “no”, and if she throws a tantrum on hearing it, that’s just to make sure it’s a firm “no” without any wiggle room.

All this time, the same feminist-indoctrinated women who were loudly and repeatedly assuring us they were at least our equals in every way… were simultaneously treating us as if we were gods who had the power to give them anything at all, so long as we could be persuaded to.

And we fell down on the road to Damascus. We realized that we were still in charge. That we had always been in charge. And we would remain in charge for as long as women looked to us to give them things and solve their problems.

Every feminist lobbying for paid maternity leave is a submissive asking daddy to care for her. Every “men can stop rape” poster is a woman admitting she cannot protect herself. Every woman complaining that we shouldn’t portray women like that in video games is a woman saying “I can’t make my own video games, please consider my wishes when you make them for both of us”. Every woman asking men for a better deal is a woman on her knees.

Feminism was never about female independence. If it were, it would not require men to cooperate or even notice. They wouldn’t need us to give them jobs if they started their own businesses. They wouldn’t need us to give them “equal pay” if they were doing the hiring. They wouldn’t need laws mandating maternity leave and free birth control if they were the ones setting, and paying, employee benefits. They wouldn’t need “no means no” if they were the ones making the sexual advances. They wouldn’t need “men can stop rape” if they took responsibility for defending themselves from psychos.

So all we have to do is stop. Say no. You can have a slightly bigger allowance, but you cannot have a pony.

That’s what the Red Pill is. Not some fool notion that women are horrible selfish bitches. Not the idea that men “should be” in charge. Just the realization that men are in charge, that we will be until the day women stop asking for, or even accepting, things from us. That if we’re in charge, we’re gonna have to take some responsibility for putting the brakes on.

We are the ones who need to say, no, a woman cannot have it all.

She has to share.

We can probably agree that the most important tenet of marxism is ‘class warfare‘, the eternal struggle between the rich and the poor.

Most of us will probably also agree that their racial theory was one of the (if not THE) most important principle of the nazis. It went something like this: the “aryan” peoples are more evolved and better than other races, but those dirty subhumans (most importantly the jews) conspire against their betters because they are agressive, feeble-minded and greedy. A closely linked tenet to this was that the sexuality of those subhumans were perverted and animalistic.

Now, add these ideas together, and what do you get?

Feminism.

Bear with me for a second.

Let’s just switch the supposed “bad guys” for men, and the “good guys” for women in both theories.

One of the basic pillars of modern feminism is that men are the rich oppressors and women are the poor victims [class warfare]. This is a patently absurd claim, of course, because there are rich women and poor men out there (at least 80% of the homeless are men for example). Feminists constantly prate about “men having it better” and other such nonsense nevertheless.

The second basic pillar of feminism is that women are noble, emphatic, meek and cooperative creatures, but men are agressive and competitive, reveling in war and rape [racial theory]. They have also conspired [patriarchy] to oppress their betters, ie. women [nazi accusations against jews].

The third pillar of feminism is that – contrary to pure and ethereal women – men’s sexuality is sick, bestial, animalistic. They are all potential rapists, pedofiles and whatnot. And even if they are not, they still ogle women’s boobs or ass pervertly (which they themselves display almost nakedly for all to see for different reasons). The natural desires of men are so contemptible, even their eyes are dirty – they objectify anything with a simple look. They stare evilly, much unlike teen girls when they drool over C.Ronaldo posters on their bedroom walls.

I feel we have most of feminism covered by adding marxism and nazism together. It might sound absurd at first, but hey, you’re welcome to try to prove me wrong. Not with shaming language, of course, but with logic and rational arguments.

And for the sake of clarity I say it again: this article is not about looking for a definition of feminism. This article is about what would be the result of adding marxism and nazism together (with a minor tweak).

I know this guy. He is agressive, he’s a rapist, a child molester, a wife beater, a chauvinist pig. He’s you.

Please help me to get rid of you. You’re bothering me. I despise you for being male, why don’t you do something about it? Why don’t men understand that men are rapist thugs, and if they do understand, why don’t they protect me from themselves? Where’s the knight in shining armor who will respond to my “men can stop rape” campaign who will keep his armor on long enough to not rape me? Men are evil and men should protect me. I am a powerful victim, an empowered damsel in distress who cannot be told what to wear but who’s in constant need of men’s help. Give me your taxes so I can be independent. Give me quotas in education so I can get in your face with schadenfreude. Give me affirmative action in the workplace so I can have your job and then complain about you being a useless man-child. Why don’t you just man up already and admit you’re an evil subhuman, a genetic mistake with a broken chromosome, a defective women with testosterone poisoning. And you should protect me from those other bastards out there, like you.

Walk the streets to look for suspicious men so you can ensure I won’t fall victim to them while I stumble around in dark alleyways totally smashed and half-naked – but at the same time please go the fuck away because if I see you there it will be you who will scare the living shit out of me, you rapist.

If you want to get into my pants you should play nice, guess my thoughts, pamper me for the princess I am, bring me flowers and candy, and if you do this you’re a fake ‘nice guy’ who is worse than thugs because he’s dishonest about just wanting to get into my pants.

We feminists fight against gender stereotypes and outdated sexist generalizatons, so we can tell you with certainty that all men are sexist pigs. Except for feminist men, except except if they turn out to be fake nice guys. All men are powerful patriarchs ruling over womenkind while sitting in their parents’ basement playing those useless videogames we girl gamers are so much better at. The world is ruled by men who are not good enough for me to marry. Where have all the good bicycles gone?

Men have no problems anyway, they can’t have any, they are the oppressors living under bridges torn from their children and paying the mortgages for houses the biological father of those children now live in with me. Men just keep whining about silly superficial stuff like the suicide rate and homelessness, and don’t give me enough attention when I rightfully complain about such blatant and outrageous crimes against humanity like the woman beating the shit out of a man for no real reason in the superbowl ad being a robot – like, objectification of women, don’t you understand?!

Those oppressive patriarchs force women to do repetitive household chores like shopping, that is why we do 3/4 of all consumer spending we poor little victims of rich men who have the privilege to work away to an early grave to hand us the money they earn while we have to suffer endless shows of Oprah lying on the couch in the comfortable concentration camp. Did I tell you that if a husband doesn’t give his money to his wife that’s domestic violence?

Men are evil, there’s no doubt about it. I can only hope that you are somewhat better than the rest, by some mistake of biology maybe. I hope you are a woman in your heart of hearts so you could understand my predicament, asking you to save me from yourself. I hope you are not a rapist thug, an evil oppressor like the rest of you.

Would you help me, pretty please?

…

The graphic suggests a 0.2% false accusation rate (2 / 1000). It’s not even consistent with the previous feminist rhetoric (2%) which itself was proven to be false (too low!) multiple times.
Also, pretending to know the exact number of unreported rapes is dishonest to say the least, feminist-inspired mumbo-jumbo notwithstanding. The definition of an unreported rape is that it is NOT REPORTED so nobody knows how many of them exist.
Also, people deemed innocent by the courts are NOT rapists, and most of the people accused but not sent to trial are not rapists either.
Also, instilling this false sense of security in actual potential rapists (you’ll get away with it 99% of the time) is actively HARMING women because it encourages potential rapists to commit the crime.
Also, this is unnecessary fearmongering and it displays a stunning hatred of men.

Men are still not suppressed, emasculated, shamed, feminized, denigrated, bashed and demonized enough? What we need is more of these? If we started squeezing little boys’ souls a little bit earlier, like, as soon as they enter kindergarten, or maybe in their cradle even, then they would grow up as women happy and healthy human beings? If we squeezed men’s souls just a little bit harder then they would be freed from their innate anger and aggression? If we force them to consider themselves worthless scum, that will lessen the number of tragic emotional outbursts?

“Machismo” is long gone, traditional gender roles are long gone, two-parent families are on their way out, “male virtues” are bashed to the ground, anything male is a target for ridicule and anger. Is this not enough? The problem is still too much maleness?

What could be the cure then? Eradicate males, like some feminists suggest? Kill’em all? Excluding you, of course, because you are enlightened. You’re a feminist. But still, you’re a male – so you’re going down with the rest of us. To the gas chamber with us, so we can save the planet by dying together. Your only escape would be to follow the footsteps of your fellow men’s studies beacon of light, the source of ultimate knowledge on maleness, Robert W. Connell, who turned himself into a woman. That is the only way to redeem yourself.

I still have things to say, but some time ago I started blogging in my native language (which is not english, in case you wondered). That takes up 110% of the energy I have for this kind of thing, mainly because in a way I “started” the MRM in my country. I’m not telling this to boast, I could care less about what you internet pixies think about my ego :) I’m telling this so you know what happened to me and why. I’m not dead, I’m not gone, I did not turn away from the manosphere – I just went from global to local. That said, if I ever have the desire to say something in english, I won’t hesitate to do it, regardless of what’s left of my old reader base :)

They never talk about anything positive, because what would be the use of talking about women leading more comfortable and carefree lifestyles than ever before? It would only make woman relaxed, maybe even peaceful. They might just throw away their “castrate!” banners and go on building a happy family or some other wicked shit.

The very existence of feminism depends on there being enough angry women, so if they don’t have enough, they create some. It’s ironic how feminism is the strongest where women have it the best – scandinavia, the anglosphere… These women are the most pampered princesses in the history of this beautiful planet and yet it is the same women who yell the most about being opressed. It’s because these are the places where the feminist propaganda infuriating women is the loudest, to put it simply. They are bombarded with maddening lies on a daily basis and it makes them mad.

Now, some might say that we MRAs do the same: we scare men in order to gain momentum for our movement. This of course is patently false, because most men become MRAs after being seriously assraped by women or the family courts, or seeing their relatives going through the process. (Most wymyn become feminists by indoctrination at school.) Also worth mentioning is that although we often talk about scary shit, we don’t need to fabricate BS like feminists do. We don’t need to come up with lies like 5 out of 4 girls are raped daily, or that stay-at-home wives are oppressed by their husbands because they are forced to do whatever the f*ck they want (be it watching ungodly amounts of tell-a-vision, sitting in starbucks chatting for hours with Sex&NY wannabes, composing music or learning quantum physics just for fun) while their husbands have the luxury and enjoyment of spending half their waking hours for their entire adult life in a 3m² cubicle they hate doing repetitive menial tasks they hate for a boss they hate. Contrary to these lunacies the things we speak of are real, for example 50% of marrieges do end in divorce, leaving 40-45% percent of all men happily smiling on their wedding photos while cutting the cake without their children, their home and a sizable portion of their future income.

Furthermore, we don’t want men to be scared, we want them to think. (Again the polar opposite of what feminists want from women.) We want men to think before they act, to give themselves – and their families – a better chance at a happy life. By warning men of the dangers ahead we aim to make them happier, not angrier. That realising said dangers do anger many of them is a sad side effect we cannot avoid.