One thing I disagree on with Citizen Renegade

The latest post at The Chateau is The Difficulty Of Gaming Women By Age Bracket in which our favourite guru formerly known as Roissy says: “Marriage is still a pussy-limiting force to contend with for the inveterate womanizer” and also “In some ways, women in the 31-34 age range are the toughest broads to game. (By “toughest”, it is meant “most time consuming”.)“.

Allow me to disagree. My personal experience is that the easiest women to game are married women in the 31-34 age range. They are the stereotypical bored housewives and neglected (stay-at-home) mothers, secretly looking for excitement and fun all the time. The operational word here is “secretly” though, so you most probably won’t meet them in clubs. This is the reason why most PUAs see the 31-34 bracket as a lost cause; they only meet the single ones crazed with the idea of marriage and kids.

Xamuel is also saying this in the comments: “Marriage is still a pussy-limiting force to contend with for the inveterate womanizer” – Only if you’ve got something against banging married women. If not, they can be reality-shatteringly easy… Beware, of course, strong doses of “red pill” this way lie ;)

Now of course I’m not “endorsing” f*cking the wives of other men. I’m especially against it if it’s done on purpose, ie. gaming married women instead of singles just for the added “excitement” of it. But there are lots of married women out there looking for easy sex nonetheless, and if a man happens to find one I don’t think he should miss the opportunity (someone else will “do it” anyways). And these easy lays might be a good chance for those guys who don’t get a lot of options otherwise.

Also, these women just above 30 are usually not that bad in the beauty department as hardcore PUAs say. Yeah, sure, they looked better when they were 21 but that’s a problem only for top PUAs and keyboard jockeying retards who insist that Danica McKellar is just a 3 at best. We already have too many of these people, discouraging average Joes from approaching women not perfect and/or not in their prime. Danica was nearing 33 when this picture was taken but I would hit that any day of the week and I feel no shame for it.

Perfection and the “beauty peak” is good, but way too overrated for everyone except a handful of higher alphas and PUA gurus. They can shrug at missed opportunities but the most of us are better off not missing them.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Game and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to One thing I disagree on with Citizen Renegade

  1. infiniium says:

    Roissy is writing about his own experience and you mainly target average Joes with your posts. I think that causes the difference of your opinions.

    I know a few women in their 30’s I’d like to “do” but a hell lots of more in their 20’s with that. But again if you want to give advise for the average or those who can’t get laid then every option is a good one. Just don’t put too much effort into elder women if there are younger ones to get.

    Oh, and one thing. There may be good looking women past 30 but their bodies ain’t feel the same.

  2. Jake Turner says:

    Love all these great posts. A lot of pent-up ideas from reading and commenting eh?

    How do you meet these married women though? Join gyms or something?

  3. Deansdale says:

    Infiniium: “Roissy is writing about his own experience
    I tried to cover this angle with “most PUAs see the 31-34 bracket as a lost cause; they only meet the single ones crazed with the idea of marriage“, with not much success it seems.

    Jake Turner: “A lot of pent-up ideas from reading and commenting eh?
    Yep :D

    How do you meet these married women though?
    I met some at work but that’s a risky business because of harassment charges. Others I found at internet forums, mostly in topics totally unrelated to dating, like religion and such. Other then these places it’s up to chance. I’d say keep your eyes open, they are everywhere :) More seriously though, I’d look around for places they frequent without their kids/husband, like specific shops, yoga or tai chi classes, and yes, gyms too, but I reckon 90+% of men wouldn’t put in the effort so your best chances really are at the workplace and on the net.

  4. infiniium says:

    Yep, didn’t want to disagree or anything. I was just thinking.

    Anyway, great blog, D. Can’t wait to read your next post!

  5. Deansdale says:

    Sorry then, it seems I was too defensive :)
    Thanx!

  6. Pingback: Weekend Link Fest – Too Damn Hot edition « Seasons of Tumult and Discord

  7. Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: White is Right Edition (NSFW)

  8. This is a wonderful post and may be one that can be followed up to see what the results are

    A mate emailed this link the other day and I am eagerly looking your next write. Keep on on the fabulous work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s