…is this guy. Disclaimer: this post of mine contains nothing extraordinary, I just dissect his post for my own amusement.
“You have the Hawaiian Libertarian Neo-Marxist, Deansdale, etc. group who are convinced of every conspiracy theory our there and even some they made up on their own since they must believe everyone but them is involved in one of the conspiracies they believe in.”
First of all if someone doesn’t know the difference between libertarianism and marxism he shouldn’t be talking about these things at all. Hawaiian Libertarian is a libertarian, period. His posts are a testament to this. Then there’s this little problem that all of us always take the time to stress that none of us believe in “every conspiracy theory”. Are you lying or are you stupid now? And also, contrary to what you say none of us are paranoid. I remember explaining to you what I think (ie. very-very few people are involved in conspiracies), which is the exact opposite of what you claim I think. I actually find it hard to believe you’re this stupid.
“Then you have Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech, The Fifth Horseman, Ferdinand Bardamu, Roissy, etc. who despite their misguided belief in game are on the level and don’t buy into conspiracy theory shit.”
Yeah, sure, everybody’s misguided but you. That’s why we are all successful people living happy lives and you named your blog Omega Virgin Revolt. I’m not trying to shame you but I think if one guy thinks that all the others are idiots it’s bloody obvious that it’s true the other way around. And what’s with this bullshit idea that people who believe in game are divided into two groups, conspiracy believers or not? There are no such groups, sherlock. There are people out there who believe in various conspiracies and there are people out there who don’t, and this is totally unrelated to what they think about game. You might as well divide “gamers” into paella-lovers and paella-haters and start making theories about how and why they devided into these groups. Ye gods and little catfish.
And we’re back at square one actually because you yourself believe in some conspiracy theories, like ‘women are out to get you‘ which sounds a lot more crazy and paranoid than anything I’ve ever said. But you have evidence, you say: you’ve been accused of sexual harassment. How that leads to the conclusion you have drawn – namely that all women are evil and they all hate you and want you dead – I fail to see.
“I asked myself why is there these two separate groups. I may have an answer. Marriage.”
Whoa! An interesting idea it would be if I was married, but I’m not. Back to the drawing board you go.
“This is a working hypothesis to better understand the difference between those gamers that are conspiracy theory nuts and those that aren’t. I doubt it’s true in every single case. But it may be true in most.”
I hate to burst your bubble but this hypothesis of yours is not working (pun intended). The main problem is you know nothing about us blogger guys. For what you know I can be Hitlery Clinton. You’ve read a handful of posts and comments from us and you think you have everything figured out. Your theorizing is meaningless.
“There are also unique cases like Obsidian”
Isn’t it hyperbole to talk about “unique cases” when you have 8 “cases” altogether? You use “etc” a lot but I doubt you could name more than 5 people in the PUA-sphere who are interested in conspiracy theories at all, and you can even include me and HL in that 5.
“Obsidian’s “conspiracy theories” are the standard black racism of “whitey is out to get me”.”
Yep, he’s simply a reverse racist but let’s just stop here for a second to acknowledge that his “whitey is out to get me” idea is the same bullshit as your “women are out to get me”. And there’s no need to call a racist a conspiracy theorist.
“There are aspects of being keyboard jockeys and internet tough guys and just being able to say, “I’m better than you” but that isn’t the whole story.”
For all its weirdness it seems to me that it’s you who think he’s better than the rest. I’ve never said anything about me being any better than any other guy out there. I just try to help them with my knowledge and experience. I was never scornful or condescending to anyone out there (excluding feminists of course). What you wrote here is just a twisted example of shaming language. You accuse us of being “keyboard jockeys and internet tough guys” while you know nothing about us and I think it’s clear as daylight that HL and I are neither of those. The definition of a keyboard jockey is someone who doesn’t have real-life experience and you couldn’t have chosen a dumber thing to accuse us of. We are talking about LTR game and we both live in LTRs so “experience” is a given for us. Are we “internet tough guys“? Dunno. I never wanted to seem “tough” and I certainly never tried to intimidate anyone with my posts or comments. The same is true for HL.
“The married gamers discovered the complete and total disaster with no escape modern marriage is for men and they can’t deal with it.”
LOL… You believe there are no happy marriages but your belief is only that, a belief, and not evidence. Also, let me remind you that I live in East Europe and the divorce laws are very different here so your theory is bleeding from every pore.
“They blame some far off external entity instead of the real problem, their wives and women in general.”
What the F are you talking about? What entity? Also, if you think wives or women are “a problem” by default then you know nothing about relationships. Well, given that you’re a virgin it’s actually evident you know nothing about relationships. But then why the fuck are you talking about them? Why are you trying to “teach” people about something you know nothing about?
“Whether its the Rockefellers, the Federal Reserve, MRAs, the Illuminati, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Ben Bernacke, lizard aliens, etc. doesn’t matter. Each of these groups is far away”
Where have anyone blamed any marital problems on the Rockefellers or Obama or whatever? Please quote. You always mix things up. Game and conspiracies are two different subjects, genius.
“Each one of the married gamers believes that game will save him from divorce. This is bullshit and when the first of the married gamers gets finanacially (or otherwise) ass raped in a divorce it will be proven bullshit.”
When I last checked the divorce rate was around 50%. This means divorce is not inevitable. And nobody ever said that game is a surefire miracle cure for divorce. It can be used to improve the quality of your (love)life and thus it reduces the risk of divorce. Take it or leave it as it is.
“Their religious belief in game is preventing the married gamers from accurately observing their wives if their wives are planning a divorce.”
I think it’s safe to say that someone with a proper understanding of game will be a lot more observant of his wife than an average Joe. If one is prone to be fooled by women it’s the one with no knowledge of game.
“they are manginas”
I told you before that the notion that maybe manginas will blame conspiracy theorists for whatever doesn’t make conspiracy theorists manginas, but it seems you’re immune to logic. What you say is the logical equivalent of saying that blacks will blame whites for whatever so whites are blacks. You just use shaming language like a feminist drone.
“How do you know what the married gamers is accurate?”
I reckon you didn’t proofread your post but hey. What I will say is that game improved my lovelife and this is a personal experience which is by its very nature subjective. Of course it can’t be measured, quantified or “proven”. But I don’t give a damn about statistics, science or whatever. What I experience is proof enough for me. You can think about what I say and you can try it. There’s no guarantee that you’ll be successful because there are other factors affecting that. But it worked for lots of guys already and I think it’s definitely worth trying. If you’re a virgin you have nothing to lose anyways.
“If you are an unmarried man the married gamers can’t tell you anything since none of their game is actually about attracting a woman.”
Every freakin’ word of any type of game is about attracting women. Of course LTR game is different from the “default” club game but all gamers want to attract women. LTR game is special in that it’s used to attract the women you are in a relationship with. Too many men are thinking that if you got into an LTR then attraction is not important anymore but boy they are wrong.
“The married gamers can only give you bullshit and this will not help you unmarried men get the real results you want.”
I’d say LTR game is even more important for unsuccessful men because they will have to keep what they get. For the types of Roissy LTR game doesn’t matter because he can waltz into any bar and tap some ass, but for you, omega, your life depends on your ability to keep your girlfriend happy because if she leaves it might mean a Sodini-sized dry spell for you. And you can rest assured that if you somehow “absorb” LTR game knowledge it will help your flirting and dating too.
“They want to get laid and they have to deal with the real world to accomplish their goal.”
You mean as opposed to gamers in LTRs who don’t have to deal with the real world? Whatever you say, dude.
You started this shitstorm with saying game don’t exist. I tried to have a civil argument about it but you responded with writing a post linking to me saying I’m a conspiracy nut. I tried debating again but your nonsense and arrogance got really old really fast. When I left you wrote another post about me saying I was trolling you. What the fuckin’ fuck?! You mention my name specifically and when I turn up to defend myself I’m “trolling you”? You’re out of your fuckin’ mind. And when I leave because of the lack of civility you consider that “victory”? Unbelievable. And then you write yet another post in which you mention me more then once. I don’t know what you want with all this but you definitely should put your act together because what you did this far is bullshit.