Somewhat to my surprise wikipedia has a page about false accusations of rape. It’s quite basic though and of course feminist-friendly. It tries to pin the number of false rape accusations around 8-9% but there are obvious signs of stat manipulations like this:
The FBI’s 1996 Uniform Crime Report states that 8% of reports of forcible rape were determined to be unfounded upon investigation, but that percentage does not include cases where an accuser fails or refuses to cooperate in an investigation or drops the charges.
In Kanin’s report a rape accusation is considered false only if the complainant admits that no rape had occurred. “She is the sole agent who can say that the rape charge is false“. The result? “The number of false rape allegations in the studied period was 45; this was 41% of the 109 total complaints filed in this period.”
His main critic – according to wiki – is David Lisak, who said:
[Dr. Kanin] simply reiterates the opinions of the police officers who concluded that the cases in question were ‘false allegations’.
WTF?! It was explicitly stated that complainants have to admit the accusation was false. What does this have to do with police officer’s opinions?!
the police department from which Kanin derived his data used or threatened to use the polygraph in every case… The fact that it was the standard procedure of this department provides a window on the biases of the officers who conducted the rape investigations
WTF?! The poligraph is a tool for finding liars. If the accuser does not lie she has nothing to fear. Using poligraphs is not “bias”, for fuck’s sake, it’s called “investigating”. If the falsely accused is denied the use of a poligraph, now that’s bias, feminist bias.
Lisak: Kanin’s 1994 article on false allegations is a provocative opinion piece, but it is not a scientific study.
wikipedia: Lisak later performed his own study, published in 2010 in Violence Against Women
I can only imagine how much more “scientific” Lisak’s study was, written for a piece of feminist propaganda. Must be like his research on rapists, in which he “finds”:
“date rape” or acquaintance rape does not, as is commonly thought, result from misunderstanding or failure for the parties to communicate, nor is it a one-time mistake
Approximately 1 in 16 men, using Lisak’s survey, reported that they had committed rape.
Fuck off, scumbag, just fuck off. Is this a real scientific finding? It’s a misandric piece of bullshit.
serial rapists accounting for 90% of campus rapes
Considering that most campuses go on for years without a single real rape case, these imaginary “serial rapists” are not very industrious, so to speak.
“Somehow all we can do is take the statement from the victim. Take the statement from the alleged perpetrator and then throw up our hands because they are saying conflicting things… That’s not how we investigate other crimes.”
I reckon this might have to do something with other crimes having some type of evidence, scumbag. The only way to resolve a “he said – she said” case is by using a poligraph… Which you are strictly against. It’s clear which side you’re on.
And this menhating piece of shit talks about science. Unbelievable. But all this stuff on him from wikipedia is far from the worst. How do you like the title of one of his “studies”: “Sexual Aggression, Masculinity, and Fathers“? Disgusting. The first sentence: “The feminist critique of rape has broadened the scope of social scientists’ efforts to understand why men rape.” Men don’t rape, fucktard. Rapists do. Your feminist allegiance excludes you from the ranks of scientists, and also from decent human beings.
Finally, for some LOLz: Lisak received his PhD from Duke University.