It’s common knowledge in the manosphere that feminism is a fraud. How anyone can talk about “equality” while lobbying for the destruction of male-only spaces and lobbying for the creation of female-only spaces is incomprehensible to the logical mind. I think we all agree that feminism has an agenda they try to hide behind PC bullshit and thus we can call feminism a conspiracy. People coming together to formulate a covert plan, the implementation of which harms masses of innocent people? Check. It’s anyone’s guess how much of this harm is intentional, considered acceptable collateral damage or absolutely unforseen, but that’s beside the point. Feminism was a marxist movement from the very beginning and it still is now, so their goal is the marxist idea of building utopia on the ruins of society – but they’ve rarely admitted it openly. If the suffragettes would have said that their goal was something like Gramsci’s cultural marxism, Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World combined together they would have been shot on sight. It’s a common argument against conspiracy theories that usually they take too much time to implement and to bear fruit, but the example of feminists is a perfect answer to this argument: yes, they did work slowly and gradually for ~150 years and now we are in this fucked up situation.
Those who spit at conspiracy “lunatics” seem to miss the fact that human history is ripe with conspiracies. Let me just copy a bit of wikipedia here:
Types of conspiracies
- Cabal, an association between religious, political, or tribal officials to further their own ends, usually by intrigue
- Conspiracy (civil), an agreement between persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal rights, or to gain an unfair advantage
- Conspiracy (crime), an agreement between persons to break the law in the future, in some cases having committed an act to further that agreement
- Conspiracy (political), the overthrow of a government
I reckon lots of governments were overthrown, tons of people were defrauded by groups of others and so on. So it’s easy to see that in our history there were thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of conspiracies. What I don’t get is what makes sceptics think that conspiracies are gone and ain’t coming back, and what makes them think that the superrich are somehow “immune” to conspiracies. They’re not. They’re of course working in their own interest and I doubt they lose sleep if they “incidentally” cause harm to people outside their elite circles. As a matter of fact market manipulation is a perfect example of a “conspiracy” because they’re hardly ever done by just one man. Trusting the international bankster elite to leave us alone to live long and prosper is a foolish thing to do. They got to where they are now by ruthlessly manipulating everything and everyone around them and amassing a fortune did not make them regret this.
Now, let’s see what the sceptics accuse us of:
“those who believe that the Jews, Zionists, Federal Reserve, Illuminati, Whites, Catholics, Freemasons, little known minority religions, homosexuals, lizard aliens from Planet X, etc. have a secret plot against them.“
First of all, let’s just make it clear that if you believe in a conspiracy it doesn’t mean you believe in all of them. If you believe the feminists are working against men that doesn’t mean you believe in reptile aliens. So stop with these silly lists already.
But let’s see what’s what nevertheless.
1. Jews. Many believe that they are the innocent victims of neverending persecution. Let me tell you, they’re not as innocent as they would like you to see them. I don’t want to get into recent problems with Israel because that’s touchy, so let’s just stick to historical facts. Example: In Hungary there was a thing called “red terror” which is described as “a series of atrocities aimed at crushing political rivals during the four-month regime of Hungarian Soviet Republic in 1919” but hungarians know that this is a PC distortion. In reality jews “hijacked” the government and started the organized killing and torturing of native hungarian people. You can verify yourself that all the leaders of the Red Terror were jews: Béla Kun (Cohn), Georg Lukacs, John Pepper, Tibor Szamuely and so on. It’s not PC to talk about this and might land you in jail on hate speach charges but it’s true. What they did then was a conspiracy against the hungarian people and I fail to see why they should be “above suspicion” nowadays.
An important thing though is that nobody believes that all jews are alike, or that all of them participate in a common conspiracy. In this context the word “jews” does not mean every single one of them, it’s just used because some jews tend to work together on a racial basis. They think of themselves as a group defined by their origins and religion, ie. jews, and that’s why we refer to them as such.
2. Zionists: It’s a religious-nationalist political movement for jews so it’s filled with radical believers and nationalists. Not an uplifting combination and I’d say they seem to be quite “prone” to conspiracies. (It’s curious how Palestine seems to slowly “disappear”.)
3. Federal Reserve. Even it’s name is a deception because there’s nothing “federal” about it – it was founded by the co-operation of other private banks (which in turn means bankster families). It had it’s role in all the economic depressions of the US – including the current one -, and it’s a researchable fact which ignorant people could care less about.
4. Illuminati. There is so little credible information out there that it’s practically meaningless to talk about them. They exist, they have their own goals, so most probably they do things to achieve them and we can only hope that they “play fair”. To say that they can’t conspire against others is idiocy but of course it’s nigh impossible to prove that they do.
5. Whites. White supremacists make conspiracies, that’s obvious (KKK?). They have no real power nowadays though so they seldom make anything spectacular. Also, it’s important to point out that we talk about supremacists/nationalists here because most of us are already fed up with generic “white shame”. Whites are not a group. A norvegian white guy has nothing to do with an argentinian one, and whites as a race never did anything together because of infighting, opposing interests and such. Talking about “whites did this” and “whites think that” is just plain old racism.
6. Catholics. I dunno. Of course they were always after money and power so they inevitably took part in conspiracies. I doubt that they would be scheming anything large nowadays. The time for crusades and the inquisition is long gone. It’s other religions we should watch more carefully.
7. Freemasons. See Illuminati.
8. Minority Religions. To do anything significant in this world you need money and power. I’m a lot more concerned about muslims than minority religions. Scientology is a strange case though, suing all those who talk ill about them.
9. Homosexuals. They are a part of the neoliberal/marxist setup and so take part in the destruction of our western societies as a “sister group” to feminists.
10. Lizard aliens. F*ck off you twit.
What’s missing from this list are the most probable suspects for a conspiracy, ie. those who have the money and power to actually do some real damage. The superrich are not that covert about their machinations as you would think. They are often caught red handed, so to speak. They describe their conspiracies in their own words, you just have to look them up. If a Rockefeller says that he plans to rule the world then it’s not so farfetched to talk about that, is it? Do a quick search on youtube for videos in which the Rockefellers themselves are talking: their topics cover population control, internet control/censorship, etc. Read some quotes from Rothschilds, too. You could also look into the Trilateral Commission (founded at the initiative of David Rockefeller) and the Council on Foreign Relations (in which Rockefeller is a permanent member).
“Rockefeller also told Russo that the elite families created and financed the women’s lib movement so they could tax another half of the population and so that the children would be trained by them in government schools rather than in the context of the family unit.”